To connect the last post to this one, I will quote a passage from Victor Katz’s A History of Mathematics textbook.
The Italian abacists of the fourteenth century were instrumental in teaching the merchants the Hindu-Arabic decimal place value system and the algorithms for using it. As is usual when a new system replaces an old traditional one, there was great resistance to the change. For many years account books were still kept in Roman numerals. It was believed that the Hindu-Arabic numerals could be altered too easily, and thus it was risky to depend on them alone in recording large commercial transactions. (The current system of writing out the amounts on checks in words dates from this time.) The advantages of the new system, however, eventually overcame the merchants initial hesitation. The old counting board system required accountants to carry around not only a board but a bag of counters, while the new system required only pen and paper and could be used anywhere. In addition, using a counting board required that preliminary steps in the calculation be eleiminated as one worked toward the final answer. With the new system, all the steps were available for checking when the calculation was finished. (Of course, these advantages would have meant nothing had not a steady supply of cheap paper been recently introduced.) The abacists instructed entire generations of middle-class Italian children in the new methods of calculation, and these methods soon spread throughout the continent.
In addition to the algorithms of the Hindu-Arabic number system, the abacists taught their students methods of problem solving using the tools of both arithmetic and Islamic algebra. The texts written by the abacists, of which several hundred different ones still exist, are generally large compilations of problems along with their solutions…
Recall that Islamic algebra was entirely rhetorical. There were no symbols for the unknown or its powers or for the operations performed on these quantities. Everything was written out in words. The same was generally true in the works of the early abacists and the earlier Italian work of Leonardo of Pisa [Fibonacci]. Early in the fifteenth century, however, some of the abacists began to substitute abbreviations for the unknowns.
In November of 2008 I wrote about some of the history of algebraic symbols, most of which was taken directly from Jeff Miller’s website Earliest Uses of Various Mathematical Symbols.
The story of the Italian mathematicians of the 16th century and their efforts to solve cubic and quartic equations is fascinating and filled with academic intrigue…
Solving the Cubic
November 21, 2008 by richbeveridge
Italy was a center of mathematical activity after the publication of Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci (1202) and the Treviso Arthmetic of 1478. These books formed the foundation for European mathematics.
At some point in the early 1500′s, an Italian mathematician named Scipione del Ferro determined a general solution for what is known as the depressed cubic equation. This is a cubic equation without any x2 terms. The general form is : x3+px=q. As it turns out, any cubic equation of the form x3+bx2+cx+d=0 can be written as a depressed cubic, but that came later.
At the time, mathematicians didn’t publish their results, but, instead, kept them secret so that they could win the problem contests that were common at the time in Italy. As a result, del Ferro didn’t tell anyone about his discovery until shortly before his death in 1526. He then revealed the secret to a student of his named Antonio Maria Fior. In 1535, Fior used this knowledge to challenge a better mathematicain named Niccolo Fontana to a problem contest.
Fontana was known as “Tartaglia,” (the stutterer) because of a speech impediment caused by an old sword wound to his jaw. Tartaglia was a superior mathematician to Fior, but didn’t know how to solve the cubic equation yet. So, in the time before the contest, he worked feverishly to find a solution. Finally, he found the same solution that del Ferro had found thirty years before and was able to win the contest.
Word of Tartaglia’s victory spread among mathematicians and Giralamo Cardano decided to see if he could get Tartaglia to reveal his secret to the solution of the cubic. At first Tartaglia refused, but then told Cardano the formula, but not how to derive it. He also asked Cardano to promise not to reveal the result to anyone else. Eventually, Cardano learned that del Ferro had found the solution first. Cardano also determined the derivation of the formula that Tartaglia had shown him for himself. So, in 1545, Cardano published the solution of the general cubic in his book Ars Magna.
It is interesting that Cardano encountered the square roots of negative numbers in working with his “cubic formula.” These numbers, which today are called imaginary, or complex numbers were almost completely unknown at the time. Cardano was initially flummoxed by these numbers that seemingly had no physical meaning. However, in true trailblazing spirit, Cardano wrote in his book that although these numbers were unfamiliar, “nevertheless, we will operate,” with them using rules similar to those used for the standard number system.
Before the publication of Ars Magna one of Cardano’s students named Ludovico Ferrari found a solution for the quartic equation. That is, an equation of the form x4+bx3+cx2+dx+e=0. This solution was also published in Ars Magna which became known throughout Europe as the foundational text of classical European algebra.
The next step in the story took place over the ensuing 250-300 years. Finally, in the early 1800′s it was shown that the quintic or fifth degree equation was not solvable by formula.
The stories of these mathematicians is told in An Imaginary Tale, by Paul Nahin and The Equation that Couldn’t be Solved by Mario Livio.
Although it’s somewhat out of historical sequence, you can read about the work of Abel and Galois in the early 1800s here.


